I also think that I could probably tweak a bunch of settings and make things better, but I could also spend about an hour and a half playing the parts into my computer through my MIDI keyboard and get a perfect result. I think it's possible that if I had a very large-print score and/or I had one that had exceptionally clear type, it'd come out OK in SmartScore or even Audiveris. The top yellow part is the scan, the bottom white and pink part is the SmartScore interpretation. The result was better than Audiveris, but nothing to write home about. It likes 470dpi BMP images, which my scanner can easily handle. So, I tried a trial of the top-of-the-line $400 Musitek SmartScore X2 Professional Edition. The program is very difficult to install and I really don't want to reinstall on my home computer.) My scanner is an Epson WF3530 which easily meets the hardware requirements for Audiveris.Īudiveris likes 300dpi JPG images - I couldn't get it to work with other file formats and higher-resolution scans didn't make any difference. It's not an exceptionally high-quality PDF, but it's not terrible. Specifically, the third movement, "Jeu," which is just a clarinet and violin duet. I tested using a PDF I downloaded of Darius Milhaud's Suite for Clarinet, Violin and Piano, Op 157b. OpenOMR (Optical Music Recognition) hasn't been updated since 2013 and there's no available documentation. OK, I'll go into more detail: there's only one free application that's currently being developed, Audiveris.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |